From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#17]
17 Mar 2005
To: Engravin' Dave (DATAKES) [#1] 18 Mar 2005
David,
About Rapid Mask, I cannot compare it to any other masking material because I have never used anything else, but in my VERY LIMITED experience, the adhesion is excellent ( it is rubbed off, and takes a small amount of effort ), and it seems to hold up well to agressive carving, but I was working on a small section and did blow out some of the letters.
It seems that "distance" from the blast nozzle to the substrate seem to be key.
Anyway, listen to ME try and tell YOU about sandcarving....
They're coming to take me away ha ha ho ho he he, they're coming to take me away
( insert laugh here)
From: UCONN Dave & Lynn too (DANDL48) [#18]
19 Mar 2005
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#17] 19 Mar 2005
Chuck,
You really have to check for bubbles around the small exposed areas and pop them when they appear in the exposed areas(area that is to be blasted off). The bubbles show up better when you view the piece at an angle.
Dave
From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#19]
19 Mar 2005
To: UCONN Dave & Lynn too (DANDL48) [#18] 19 Mar 2005
Dave,
Thanks for the tip. I think I am making progress.
What I have done at this point is cut the rapid mask into approximately 3" squares. I then remove both of the carrier sheets leaving only the mask. This allows me to lay the mask flatter with few air bubble.
Next I laser etch the logo, I then blasted it. The longest part of the process was removing the carrier sheets.
The attached photo is the result. It still needs some refining, but I'm getting there I think.
The question I have now is, is the laser resist, basically the rapid mask with out the carrier sheets?
Thanks
From: precisionlaser [#20]
19 Mar 2005
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#19] 19 Mar 2005
Hi, Chuck...
Laser Tape is not the same thing as RapidMask without the slip sheet.
Laser Tape (and Rayzist's LaserMask) is a non-PVC film (a form of non-PVC vinyl?) which is not UV-sensitive. RapidMask is a different product chemically (I think polymer based, but am not sure) and of course is UV-sensitive.
With a 6:1 price ratio, it's safe to say that they are two completely different products...
Mark
Message 304.21 was deleted
From: UCONN Dave & Lynn too (DANDL48) [#22]
19 Mar 2005
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#19] 19 Mar 2005
Chuck,
Mark basically covered it all. You're more pacient than I peeling both sheets off, wow.
From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#23]
19 Mar 2005
To: precisionlaser [#20] 20 Mar 2005
Mark,
Is it more flexible and pliable than rapid mask?
From: precisionlaser [#24]
20 Mar 2005
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#23] 20 Mar 2005
I'd need to get back to the office to compare, and of course, it depends on which RapidMask you're thinking about (HT vs. HD). My recollection is that the HT (4 mil) is equivalent in feel to the LaserTape, which isn't surprising, given that they're the same thickness. I also think that the carrier sheets are responsible for much of the feel, as mentioned in an another thread. Now, the RapidMask HD seems very pliable to me (2 mil) and I'd think that this is the stuff to use on compound curves.
I wonder if you warmed the mask with a blow dryer once it's applied and after the carrier is removed, if that would cause it to conform to the curves better. Just a thought.
Mark
From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#25]
20 Mar 2005
To: precisionlaser [#24] 20 Mar 2005
A blow drier huh? That is not a bad idea. I'll give it a try.
From: Engravin' Dave (DATAKES) [#26]
8 Apr 2005
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#17] 8 Apr 2005
Chuck,
I spoke with Photobrasive this week and they have updated their recommended exposure settings for RapidMask on the NuArc unit I have. As suspected, my problem was a result of inadequate exposure. I think I have the same problem with my marketing programs sometimes. 8^)
From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#27]
8 Apr 2005
To: Engravin' Dave (DATAKES) [#26] 9 Apr 2005
David,
I totally understand what you mean. Today is probably NOT a day to talk about it.
Have a great weekend. We are off to dinner at the Outback.......
From: Engravin' Dave (DATAKES) [#28]
9 Apr 2005
To: UCONN Dave & Lynn too (DANDL48) [#18] 9 Apr 2005
Dave,
I spoke with Photobrasive about RapidMask and they recently adjusted their recommended settings from 60 integrator units to 90 for the exposure unit I use. Do you use the same exposure time for RapidMask HT and HD?
Which product are you finding that you use more often -- HD or HT?
What printer and inks are you using to print your negative image on the AccuBlack film?
I recall from an earlier conversation that there was a substrate that the RapidMask would leave an actual discoloration mark where it was applied. Am I correct in recalling that that substrate was marble?
ÂÂÂÂÂ
EDITED: 9 Apr 2005 by DATAKES
From: UCONN Dave & Lynn too (DANDL48) [#29]
9 Apr 2005
To: Engravin' Dave (DATAKES) [#28] 9 Apr 2005
David
You are correct about the marble. If I blast and than paint the mable and it is exposed to sunlight, the marble area that is not under the masking tape takes on shape of the exposed resist even though it is under paint. No problem with it if I spray paint outside and immediately bring it inside and put it in a dark place. We use HD about 90? of the time when not using the laser to burn the resist. Only with marble do I use the thicker resist sind I like to go deeper in marble.
We use the laterlite exposure system and expose both for 4 min. Wish I could afford the system you have.
We use the HP 5550 deskjet with their standard black ink on Accublack velum.
Dave
Show messages:
1-16
17-29