Full Version: to Dye sub or not to dye sub
From: jpkevin [#20]
14 Dec 2006
To: Doug (JDOUG5170) [#19] 14 Dec 2006
Hi Doug,
I agree and disagree with your statement about Inkjet sublimation versus laser.
I agree that people should check out ALL available technologies before purchasing any equipment. They need to find the technologies that best fit what they are looking for. There is not currently ANY technology that does everything. You may very well need a mixture of technoligies.
Laser (both sublimation, and non-sublimation) has its pros and cons, and inkjet certainly has its pros and cons. Neither is perfect.
I certainly believe that inkjet sublimation is a very viable and profitable business. If you have the proper equipment and support.
From: Doug (JDOUG5170) [#21]
14 Dec 2006
To: jpkevin [#20] 14 Dec 2006
Kevin...you're right. It is like engraving...some stuff works best with laser, some with rotary, and some in the sandbox...but...I doubt that most engravers started with all 3 at one time.
My thought is, as troublesome as inkjet is, especially if not used regularly, laser is a good direction to look into...much less trouble for the startup.
I switched to OEM laser a couple of years ago and other than large format, I've not found anything that I could not do and some that I could not do with inkjet.
I was just trying to alert folks here that might be looking that there was emerging technology being introduced over on DSSI...
Doug
From: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#22]
14 Dec 2006
To: Doug (JDOUG5170) [#19] 15 Dec 2006
Doug,
Good idea to point that out. As a sublimation neophyte, I started with inkjet. I did that because I did not like the "look" of OEM but I have recently ordered some paper from Cactus and will be playing around with it.
It was either in a post that I read or a comment someone made that in essence states it is good to have both processes.
Like you mentioned in another post one needs all processes.
Anyway, thanks for pointing that out.
Show messages: 1-19 20-22