Full Version: EARLY Political Straw Poll

From: UncleSteve [#13]
 13 Feb 2007
To: gt350ed [#10] 13 Feb 2007

Edwards is out of the race due to his handling of two of his staffers.... both anti-christian bloggers that he/his staff refused to fire until minutes after the story broke wide open on the O'Reilly tv show....

Edwards refused to discuss the matter before it went public and was supporting the two "ladies" right up to after the tv disclosure which he KNEW was coming since he was asked to appear to discuss it a week before the show aired.

What part of DUMB doesn't he understand?

From: gt350ed [#14]
 13 Feb 2007
To: LaZerDude (C_BURKE) [#12] 13 Feb 2007

It's your poll. Far be it from me to suggest that it actually be representative of the entire serious slate of candidates, or what may actually be the contenders in the end.

At least two of the three that you have put so much weight behind won't even be there their respective party's nominee. Guaranteed.

From: gt350ed [#15]
 13 Feb 2007
To: gt350ed [#14] 13 Feb 2007

My vote is "NONE OF THE ABOVE". Our next President is not listed among the choices. I guarantee it.

From: Cody (BOBTNAILER) [#16]
 13 Feb 2007
To: gt350ed [#15] 14 Feb 2007

Gotta agree with Ed on this one....I don't think our next president will be any of the above. Clearly, I don't know.

Can't remember the guy's name right now, but I'm liking the Congressman from California. I've heard a couple of interviews with him, and so far I like what I hear. He seems to be a pretty staunch conservative....for now.


From: Dee (DEENA-ONLY) [#17]
 13 Feb 2007
To: Cody (BOBTNAILER) [#16] 14 Feb 2007

I guess this is what makes politics. If he is a staunch conservative he will NEVER get my vote. I want a leader who looks at the issue and doesn't follow the party line. Am I naive - probably! Do I keep hoping - absolutely!

Dee


From: RALLYGUY (RALLYGUY1) [#18]
 14 Feb 2007
To: Cody (BOBTNAILER) [#16] 14 Feb 2007

Giulioni's leadership goes a long way for me, but I take issue with some of his core values that shift him to the left (abortion for one).......I think he may be a hard guy to beat however, because I know many left of the aisle that like him because of his core value shift...I'm just not sure he represents the party base. I see him as a front runner at this point, but it would be nice to see more choices. It's extremely early to be calling winners.....

McCain is to the Republicans to what Lieberman must be to the Democrats. A black sheep gone astray........I have no trust in him doing the "right thing" for people with my core values. These two should run together and pick up all the moderates as an alternative party ;)

Hillary is a deep rooted liberal in a moderates clothing .......Obamma has an extremely liberal voting record, even though both of them are aiming towards the center to gain voters.

Far too early to tell....although I see Guilioni as the head of the pack for leadership and ability to pick up the moderate voter. It all depends on if the Grand Old Party will get behind him or not........He may lose too much of the base to win the big dance.

My hope is that someone with great leadership and character will step up to the plate for the GOP, but I'm not holding my breath. Perhaps Duncan Hunter???

Major points of interest for me in this next election.......Mouth service isn't enough any more...We need some action.

1. Border security. Obviously needed for immigration reform, and security of our country against Terrorist attacks. Lets start doing military maneuvers on the borders with live ammo...That ought to keep them back on their side of the fence.... :)

2. Immigration reform. Enough already. Lets uphold the current laws or change them the way the founding fathers allowed for change. Make it less appealing to break the law than it is to follow it. Threats without consequences are what created this problem...We need a healthy dose of consequences to fix it.

3. Iraq war. Let the military win on their terms, Don't hold them back for political correctness. Let them win the war...Don't send them home with a job half done unless THEY determine that the situation is hopeless. All the armchair Generals need not apply.

EDITED: 14 Feb 2007 by RALLYGUY1


From: Stunt Engraver (DGL) [#19]
 14 Feb 2007
To: RALLYGUY (RALLYGUY1) [#18] 14 Feb 2007

quote:
Make it less appealing to break the law than it is to follow it.


Brian,

On immigration reform, maybe you heard, (on last evening's newcast), that the good old Bank of America is offering credit cards to people with no Social Security numbers (read as illegal aliens).

How about the union in South Carolina allowing people of questionable immigration status to join their ranks?

Their logic being, if the people were hired by the meat packing plant, they must have shown proper identification, in order to be hired, therefore, we can bring them into the union.

In both cases, just another fund raising practice. :S

EDITED: 14 Feb 2007 by DGL


From: RALLYGUY (RALLYGUY1) [#20]
 14 Feb 2007
To: Stunt Engraver (DGL) [#19] 14 Feb 2007

I agree....it's all crap.....Businesses, renters, and any licensing or credit card company need to be responsible for what they are doing..........Accountability needs to be there all the way through the system.

From: Stunt Engraver (DGL) [#21]
 14 Feb 2007
To: RALLYGUY (RALLYGUY1) [#20] 14 Feb 2007

Brian,

If all illegal immigrants were packed on buses and sent home, not only would many of our industries come to a screeching halt, the same people would be back in the country within weeks.

We have no vested interest in enforcing the immigration laws. Sounds good on paper, but I doubt we'll see it in our lifetimes.

Bush's proposed "Guest Worker Program" makes sense, (to me) but it drew a luke warm reception.

EDITED: 14 Feb 2007 by DGL


From: RALLYGUY (RALLYGUY1) [#22]
 14 Feb 2007
To: Stunt Engraver (DGL) [#21] 14 Feb 2007

I dissagree.....

What would happen is you wouldn't have to mandate minimum wage laws and the free market would take care of itself as it should.


From: Stunt Engraver (DGL) [#23]
 14 Feb 2007
To: RALLYGUY (RALLYGUY1) [#22] 14 Feb 2007

Brian,

Business controls the government and business wants cheap labor.

What business wants, business gets.

What the people want is irrelevant.

From: Brian (BRIAN_R) [#24]
 14 Feb 2007
To: ALL

Brian,
I agree with you whole heartedly!
First day on a new forum and I'm posting on politics?
I must be mad!?
80 to 90% of the people want the ILLEGAL immigrants to stop breaking the law. Our elected leaders don't hear us.
I heard a number the other day, 25 citizens of our country are killed by illegals every day. Doing jobs some Americans won't do I guess.

Brian R


From: Stunt Engraver (DGL) [#25]
 14 Feb 2007
To: Brian (BRIAN_R) [#24] 14 Feb 2007

quote:
First day on a new forum and I'm posting on politics?
I must be mad!?


How easy it is to get sucked in. :P

From: gt350ed [#26]
 14 Feb 2007
To: Stunt Engraver (DGL) [#25] 14 Feb 2007

Both you and Brian have successfully hyjacked this thread; although I'm lovin it! :O)

From: RALLYGUY (RALLYGUY1) [#27]
 14 Feb 2007
To: Brian (BRIAN_R) [#24] 14 Feb 2007

It must be in the name.... ;)

Good luck............Politics and Religion are always hot topics. (angel) (devil)


From: Stunt Engraver (DGL) [#28]
 14 Feb 2007
To: gt350ed [#26] 14 Feb 2007

Ed,

I'll bring it back on track by agreeing with those who say the eventual winner isn't amongst the three contenders Chuck listed.

I suspect it will be someone who climbs in during the later stages, after the early birds have sufficiently had the skin pulled from their bones. >.<

Newty is making noises about jumping in and I wouldn't be surprised to see Gore in the hunt before the dust settles.

EDITED: 14 Feb 2007 by DGL


From: RALLYGUY (RALLYGUY1) [#29]
 14 Feb 2007
To: Stunt Engraver (DGL) [#23] 14 Feb 2007

No matter if your right or wrong on your perspective on businesses and their power (and I think you're wrong)......I think it's still a cop out to give them a pass. It's nothing more than defeatism.

You're blaming everything except for the people breaking the laws....When is it their responsibility for their actions? When do they get to be accountable for breaking the laws?

Eliminate the benefits, and create an environment that makes it more pleasurable to stay home, or worth while to go through the steps necessary to become a real American citizen. They shouldn't be able to get any benefits of citizenship of this country if they are not a citizen, including constitutional benefits, housing, medical, financial, jobs etc......... No exceptions.

The laws are already there.......They need to be actively enforced for two reasons. The first of which is to deal with the drag these people are putting on the system, and secondly for the security of this nation.

From: RALLYGUY (RALLYGUY1) [#30]
 14 Feb 2007
To: gt350ed [#26] 14 Feb 2007

Sorry Ed.....You're absolutely right............

Was just following it like a casual conversation.......


From: Stunt Engraver (DGL) [#31]
 14 Feb 2007
To: RALLYGUY (RALLYGUY1) [#29] 14 Feb 2007

quote:
You're blaming everything except for the people breaking the laws....When is it their responsibility for their actions? When do they get to be accountable for breaking the laws?


Brian,

Are you trying to turn this into a Dick Cheney topic? :-)

From: RALLYGUY (RALLYGUY1) [#32]
 14 Feb 2007
To: Stunt Engraver (DGL) [#31] 14 Feb 2007

quote:
Are you trying to turn this into a Dick Cheney topic?


Apparently you are......... I-) Wake me up when you have something interesting to say....... :P

EDITED: 14 Feb 2007 by RALLYGUY1


Show messages:  1-12  13-32  33-52  53-57

Back to thread list | Login

© 2024 Project Beehive Forum