Remember...... - Engraving Etc. Forum

From:	LaZerDude (C_BURKE)	1 Nov 2006
To:	Peter	21 of 51

5208.21 In reply to 5208.14
quote: May I point out, that Sir Leyton Barr-Hopworths 1928 thesis on Geometric Transversal was the leading paper on disproving that there was not only a possibility, but...all previous notions that all transcendental permeations were totally congruant with the supporting hypothesis. I Stand corrected.

From:	Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY)	1 Nov 2006
To:	LaZerDude (C_BURKE)	22 of 51

5208.22 In reply to 5208.21
And I sit here confounded. Philadelphia, PA (Really Bensalem) When you finally understand it completely... it changes.

From:	UncleSteve	1 Nov 2006
To:	Peter	23 of 51

5208.23 In reply to 5208.16
quote: Steve is trying to throw a little humour into a very....serious debate Bambi says its not nice to fool with Mother Nature! (devil) "Don't believe everything you think!"

From:	LaZerDude (C_BURKE)	1 Nov 2006
To:	UncleSteve	24 of 51

5208.24 In reply to 5208.23
quote: Bambi says its not nice to fool with Mother Nature! (devil) And just WHAT does "Bambi" know about thermo particulate continuim dynamic hypothises's? HUH? Peter can barely comprehend.....let alone "Bambi"
EDITED: 1 Nov 2006 by C_BURKE

From:	UncleSteve	1 Nov 2006
To:	LaZerDude (C_BURKE)	25 of 51

5208.25 In reply to 5208.24
quote: Peter can barely comprehend.....let alone "Bambi" Chuck, NEVER assume!!!! :S "Don't believe everything you think!"

From:	Peter	1 Nov 2006
To:	LaZerDude (C_BURKE)	26 of 51

5208.26 In reply to 5208.24

hmmmm..

who stood corrected ???????

;-)

Peter Vasic
Engraving Services Co.
Adelaide, Australia.
http://www.engravingservices.com.au

From:	LaZerDude (C_BURKE)	2 Nov 2006
To:	Peter	27 of 51

5208.27 In reply to 5208.26
I did............. Based of course on the hypothetical theorum of the densified particulate matter of the hyperbolic continuim.....

From:	Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE)	2 Nov 2006
To:	LaZerDude (C_BURKE)	28 of 51

5208.28 In reply to 5208.27

But what power and speed setting to engrave that particulate you keep talking about? I have a client on the phone asking about it as we speak...

Gary

From:	Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY)	2 Nov 2006
To:	Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE)	29 of 51

5208.29 In reply to 5208.28
You must collate your particle beam to keep the interference patterns from becoming hyperbolic. Philadelphia, PA (Really Bensalem) When you finally understand it completely... it changes.

From:	LaZerDude (C_BURKE)	2 Nov 2006
To:	Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE)	30 of 51

5208.30 In reply to 5208.28
Gary, the particulate is particularly difficult to parse with a laser especially on the hyperbolic. MY machine won't do the job, so I was thinking of getting the 400 w Universal I saw last year.........

From:	Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE)	2 Nov 2006
To:	Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY)	31 of 51

5208.31 In reply to 5208.29
Well, it will just have to wait until tomorrow. I am spending the day with tech support aligning my beam with the red dot - now I have to collate it too?

From:	Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE)	2 Nov 2006
To:	LaZerDude (C_BURKE)	32 of 51

5208.32 In reply to 5208.30
400Watt - I thought 30 would be plenty for most of the things I need to do. Next you'll tell me that my servo motors won't work and I need stepper :'-(

From:	Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY)	2 Nov 2006
To:	Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE)	33 of 51

5208.33 In reply to 5208.31
Yes. Philadelphia, PA (Really Bensalem) When you finally understand it completely... it changes.

From:	LaZerDude (C_BURKE)	2 Nov 2006
To:	Laser Image (LASER_IMAGE)	34 of 51

5208.34 In reply to 5208.32
Gary, No, you servo motors should be fine as long as you don't try the convex hyperbolic......the concave works fine.........

From:	GBengraver	2 Nov 2006
To:	LaZerDude (C_BURKE)	35 of 51

5208.35 In reply to 5208.34
you servo motors should be fine How do you know he is a servo motor? Is it his accent? Greg "Nothing is really work unless you would rather be doing something else."

From:	Peter	2 Nov 2006
To:	LaZerDude (C_BURKE)	36 of 51

5208.36 In reply to 5208.34

we've had a massive misfunction with our themagulated hyper extender. As a result all our disticular arlanthiams have been burnt.

We now have to replace the particulant nano expander and re calibrate the thermolaterizer...otherwize it will just burn holes straight thru the metal...as we all know..

does everyone concur ?

Peter Vasic
Engraving Services Co.
Adelaide, Australia.
http://www.engravingservices.com.au

From:	LaZerDude (C_BURKE)	2 Nov 2006
To:	Peter	37 of 51

5208.37 In reply to 5208.36
quote: We now have to replace the particulant nano expander and re calibrate the thermolaterizer...otherwize it will just burn holes straight thru the metal...as we all know.. Peter, Whatever would you do without me.......I know that you know that I know that you know that you know that you must be EXTREMELY careful whe replacing the particulant nano expander, because if you do NOT take special note to know the correct pressure applied to the particulant, during recalibration, it is likely that it could become very parallent there by resulting in massive burns to the testiculant partition of the thermolaterizer its self, reducing the potency of the entire process. I KNOW that you know that I know that you know that. You DO know that don't you?

From:	Engravin' Dave (DATAKES)	2 Nov 2006
To:	LaZerDude (C_BURKE)	38 of 51

5208.38 In reply to 5208.37
Wear your safety goggles. :S

From:	Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY)	3 Nov 2006
To:	Peter	40 of 51

5208.40 In reply to 5208.36
Told you that you should have collumated the particle beam. Now you are in a pile of burned brown stuff. Philadelphia, PA (Really Bensalem) When you finally understand it completely... it changes.

Show messages: 1-20 21-40 41-51

Adjust text size: Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.0.1 | FAQ | Docs | Support | Donate!