Folder Glass Etching/ SandblastingWine Glass Question


Warning Press Ctrl+Enter to quickly submit your post
Quick Reply  
✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏✏
 
 
  

Previous
Next
 From:  PenMan
 To:  Pete (AWARDMASTERS) 
3844.6 In reply to 3844.2 
Maybe that's my problem. I do it the same way.

Pen Man (aka Chris Tegard)
Treasured Creations
www.eTreasuredCreations.com

 

Previous
Next
 From:  PenMan
 To:  deeb (DEBRIPPETOE) 
3844.7 In reply to 3844.5 
I agree. I have used the wet paper towel and it turns out OK. After posting I decided to try a couple of layers of painters tape. I then lasered it and then sand blasted it. It turns out better than just lasering but I was afraid to go deep enough with just the tape as a mask. Even the painters tape was hard to get on without bubbles, wrinkles, etc. I might have to try the spray mask idea from Chuck. I'm participating in a wine festival over Memorial Day weekend and wanted to have some bottles and glasses to show and take orders. I also wanted to be able to show the difference between just lasering and sand blasting. I primarily sell turned wood bottle stoppers there.

Pen Man (aka Chris Tegard)
Treasured Creations
www.eTreasuredCreations.com

 

Previous
Next
 From:  deeb (DEBRIPPETOE)
 To:  PenMan 
3844.8 In reply to 3844.6 
I use the rayzist photmask. It works excellent! A tad expensive.
deeb
 

Previous
Next
 From:  Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY)
 To:  deeb (DEBRIPPETOE) 
3844.9 In reply to 3844.5 

I have found that contrary to all advice here the only way to get most glass to engrave is to use about 4 times the power that shows a good mark.

I always get some edge fracturing, really small but not up to my quality levels. It also left fragments that you could not see but would stick in your fingers. I did a test of the higher power after trying every piece of advice. It gave me a nearly sandblasted result with no fracturing. When I say nearly sandblasted result I mean that glass was removed and a blasted look was achieved.

Philadelphia, PA (Really Bensalem)

Harvey's Tips Page When you finally understand it completely... it changes.

EDITED: 17 May 2006 by HARVEY-ONLY

 

Previous
Next
 From:  deeb (DEBRIPPETOE)
 To:  Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY) 
3844.10 In reply to 3844.9 

When you bump up the power, do you still use a wet paper towel? Can you share a power setting, speed and wattage? I will try it to see if I get a quality comparable to blasting.

Thanks!

deeb
 

Previous
Next
 From:  Bob (BOBBELT)
 To:  deeb (DEBRIPPETOE) 
3844.11 In reply to 3844.10 

I don't think you can get a quality comparable to sand carving. At first I was very happy with just the laser on glass (and still am for photos), but after getting a small blast cabnet, I don't offer straight lasering any more. I always follow up with the sand blaster. There is just no comparison to me.
Bob

 

Previous
Next
 From:  Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY)
 To:  deeb (DEBRIPPETOE) 
3844.12 In reply to 3844.10 
25 Watt 40 IPS unit.

Looking up the settings I get 100% power, 50% speed.

No towel or anything. Just let her rip.

I tried soap solution, wet towels, wet newspaper, just needed slightly different settings all around 50% power and 100% speed. This did a far better job. It will NOT do photographs.

Philadelphia, PA (Really Bensalem)

Harvey's Tips Page When you finally understand it completely... it changes.

 

Previous
Next
 From:  logojohn
 To:  ALL
3844.13 In reply to 3844.11 
I have swithched to dish liquid soap with no towel on glass.

Details in this archive message.
http://www.engravingetc.org/forum/index.php?webtag=EE&msg=357.8

.
trophiesinc.com
 

Previous
Next
 From:  Bob (BOBBELT)
 To:  Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY) 
3844.14 In reply to 3844.12 

Harvey,
I use 100p 40s 300ppi 3ID and process the photo in PhotoGrav. The picture here is really a bad representation of what it looks like in person, but gets the point across I think. I do photos on glass fairly often, but I always sand carve everything else.
Bob

 

Previous
Next
 From:  Ken D. (KDEVORY)
 To:  Bob (BOBBELT) 
3844.15 In reply to 3844.14 
Nice work. Did you use any color fill?
Ken Devory Jr.
 

Previous
Next
 From:  Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY)
 To:  Bob (BOBBELT) 
3844.16 In reply to 3844.14 

If that is a bad representation, I'd fall off my chair seeing a good one.

Your power settings are close to mine. Very interesting.

I am not sure what 3ID is, is it a diameter?

Apparently 300 PPI, (reduces the DPI to at least as low as 300), is a good value for glass.

Philadelphia, PA (Really Bensalem)

Harvey's Tips Page When you finally understand it completely... it changes.

 

Previous
Next
 From:  Myyk
 To:  ALL
3844.17 

To reiterate, I now laser at 1000 dpi. 100% power through signwriters application tape on glasses, then sandblast lightly using the application tape as a mask. All with a 25watt GCC Mercury.
It's the only way I can achieve consistent results on glass with the laser as I find that glass varies so much.
Also easier than photo-resist. The application tape seems to conform to compound curves reasonably well, and the resulting work tends to be consistently straighter round the glass than photo resist or vinyl.

 

Previous
Next
 From:  Bob (BOBBELT)
 To:  Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY) 
3844.18 In reply to 3844.16 

Harvey,
ID is image density (same as DPI) (I have a ULS M-360, 40w). Glass seems to work best at a setting of 3 with the PPI set at 300. Like I said, I can laser photos with this, but the lettering and other non-photos I very much prefer blasting.
Bob

 

Previous
Next
 From:  Bob (BOBBELT)
 To:  Ken D. (KDEVORY) 
3844.19 In reply to 3844.15 

Ken,
I do spray paint bottles, and sometimes will hand paint small flowers or other things. It can be a pain, but I've recently found that Krylon Fusion paint seems to do real well.
Bob

 

Previous
Next
 From:  Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY)
 To:  Bob (BOBBELT) 
3844.20 In reply to 3844.18 
Thanks, I did not recognize the shorthand. I did like the driver better when it gave the ID as DPI. (3 is 333 DPI).

Philadelphia, PA (Really Bensalem)

Harvey's Tips Page When you finally understand it completely... it changes.

EDITED: 18 May 2006 by HARVEY-ONLY

 

Previous
Next
 From:  gingem
 To:  ALL
3844.21 

I'm sorry all of you laser people, there is no comparison between laser engraving glass and sandblasting. Laser on glass shatters the edges and besides you can't get any depth to the cut. Photo resist is the best way and when all is compared, it is the least expensive.
I do an awful lot of crystal and glass, the cost of photo resist is approximately $0.06 per square inch. On an average toasting glass that means you might be looking at $0.50. All other costs are labor which you would have in setting up your machine so they are a wash. I charge $20-30.00 a pair for blasting crystal toasting glasses which total actual time takes 15 minutes start to finish.
Yes there is some learning curve but that is in anything we do in this industry. As far as the curves on the glass the orange is a way but here is another that I use on a lot of pieces. By the way I only do this for pieces that I will always be doing again.
1-Take masking tape and put it across the area that you want to engrave.
2- Turn the glass upside down so that you are using the straight edge of the top of the glass for your alignment.
3- Draw as many lines as you need for what you are going to engrave on the glass making them parallel with the top of the glass. I use a vertical height gauge modified to hold a wet erase marker.
4- Make sure you mark the center of all of the lines.
5- Peel of the masking tape from the glass and apply it to a flat piece of paper. You might have to make cuts in this to make it lay flat, just as you would to put a mask on the glass itself.
6- Take this and scan it into whatever graphics program you are using (I use Corel) and trace the lines so that you have a vector setup for your glass.
7- Now save the vector lines as a blank template for the glass or vase so that you can always import it in the future.
8- Type your text and select the lines you want it on and fit text to path. The mask will look crazy, put it will make your lines exactly straight and easier to put on the curved surface.

Sorry for the length of this just got carried away. Hope it might help

Have A Great Day!
Bill Meyer
Ginny's Gems
www.ginnysgems.com

 

Previous
Next
 From:  Myyk
 To:  gingem 
3844.22 In reply to 3844.21 

Way too much work for me!
All glasses are not the same, so you would have to have a number of different templates. Same goes for inscriptions with different numbers of lines of text.
I guess you could do it that quickly if you have dedicated workshop areas for exposing, washing out, etc., but I don't, so can't come near to your time of 15 minutes.
Enjoyed your great informative post though. Thanks!!

 

Previous
Next
 From:  logojohn
 To:  Myyk 
3844.23 In reply to 3844.22 
The sandblasting looks better but most of our customers are in a hurry and can't wait more than a day or 2.

We give the customers a choice. Many times their short deadlines are critical and their only option is laser. The laser can produce a good quality look that most people are happy with.

We have a good outside vendor if they can wait longer.
We don't have the time, expertise or equipment to sandblast in house.

We have a lot of very detailed logos including small text that would be difficult with sand blasting.


.
trophiesinc.com
 

Previous
Next
 From:  Harvey only (HARVEY-ONLY)
 To:  gingem 
3844.24 In reply to 3844.21 
Maybe I have found the magic settings, on glass, not crystal), I can get a decent depth and no edge fractures. It took me a while to figure that out, everything else left those fractures and no depth.

Philadelphia, PA (Really Bensalem)

When you finally understand it completely... it changes.

 

Previous
Next
 From:  Engravin' Dave (DATAKES)
 To:  gingem 
3844.25 In reply to 3844.21 

Hi Bill,

Thank you for sharing. I use this technique on one-of-a-kind larger pieces as well, primarilly because I want it to look it's best and am able to charge for the extra time it takes.

 
   
 

Show messages:  1-5  6-25  26

Rate my interest:

Adjust text size: Smaller 10 Larger

Beehive Forum 1.0.1 |  FAQ |  Docs |  Support |  Donate! ©2002 - 2024 Project Beehive Forum

Forum Stats